Feeds:
Entradas
Comentarios

Archive for the ‘George W. Bush’ Category

Bush closes the gap

Public Policy Polling:

Perhaps the greatest measure of Obama’s declining support is that just 50% of voters now say they prefer having him as President to George W. Bush, with 44% saying they’d rather have his predecessor. Given the horrendous approval ratings Bush showed during his final term that’s somewhat of a surprise and an indication that voters are increasingly placing the blame on Obama for the country’s difficulties instead of giving him space because of the tough situation he inherited. The closeness in the Obama/Bush numbers also has implications for the 2010 elections. Using the Bush card may not be particularly effective for Democrats anymore, which is good news generally for Republicans and especially ones like Rob Portman who are running for office and have close ties to the former President.

Fuente –>

Políticas Sueltas - 92

… ouch …

Anuncio publicitario

Read Full Post »

La popularidad de Obama desciende por primera vez del 50 por ciento

El índice de aprobación del presidente estadounidense, Barack Obama, ha descendido por primera vez del 50 por ciento desde su llegada a la Casa Blanca, según los datos de una encuesta realizada por Gallup y que ratifica sondeos anteriores que ya anticipaban la pérdida de confianza en la labor de Obama de la mayor parte de la población estadounidense.

El sondeo de Gallup situaba el índice de aprobación en torno al 49 por ciento, un punto menos del 50 por ciento de aprobación con el que comenzó la encuesta el pasado martes. Según los analistas consultados por el diario ‘USA Today’, "no es un cambio estadísticamente significativo, pero desde luego se trata de un momento histórico aquel en el que un presidente ya no puede atribuirse la confianza de la mitad del pueblo estadounidense".

La crisis económica y el desempleo derivado de la misma son los dos principales motivos del descenso de la confianza en el presidente estadounidense, quien a principios de julio contaba el apoyo de seis de cada diez estadounidenses. Desde ese punto, la confianza ha ido descendiendo progresivamente.

Este descenso de confianza tiene precedentes históricos. "Todos los presidentes modernos excepto John Fitzgerald Kennedy han bajado del 50 por ciento a lo largo de su presidencia, y luego todos han terminado recuperándose", indica el analista de Gallup, Jeff Jones, a ‘USA Today’. Pero sí se destaca que ninguno de ellos había descendido tan pronto por debajo de este porcentaje psicológico: sólo Gerald Ford y Bill Clinton han caído más rápido que Obama en este sentido.

Entre los presidentes que más tiempo han aguantado con el respaldo de la mayoría de los encuenstados se cuentan Harry Truman (11 meses), Jimmy Carter (13 meses), Richard Nixon (25 meses), Lyndon Johnson (29 meses), George H. W. Bush (36 meses) y su hijo George W. Bush, con 37 meses. El récord lo ostenta Dwight Eisenhower, quien sólo registró una cierta pérdida de confianza popular a los 63 meses: al quinto año de su mandato.

Fuente –>

Le falta a USA Today aclarar que el GRAN colapso de la popularidad de Bobama fue el de querer llevar terroristas a suelo americano, cerrar Guantánamo, no cumplir con cerrar Gitmo, subir los impuestos alevosamente, llevar a Estados Unidos hacia el socialismo y por sobre todas las cosas destruir el Sistema de Salud intentando socializarlo. Pero ya es suficiente con que lo reconozcan, no pretendo que otro progreperiódico interprete correctamente la realidad.

No me imagino cómo, pero ya será culpa de Bush, que dicho sea de paso, en noviembre de su primer año de mandato tenía niveles récord de popularidad.

Lo que sí imagino es a Reid, Pelosi o alguno de esos esperando un atentado puertas adentro para que el buenísimo líder suba su popularidad, but it’s too late, el iceberg está cerca.

Miss Me Yet

P.D.: Naturalmente ahora viene el violento y obsceno ataque a Sarah Palin para ver si se compensa.

Read Full Post »

6.23.2009_Credit_Report

American Spectator Blog

Lo mejor que hará Commie Obama será limpiar, con acciones y no con palabras, el nombre de George W. Bush.

Read Full Post »

En las últimas elecciones legislativas de Estados Unidos el Partido Demócrata se hizo con el control de ambas cámaras y se dedicó a entorpecer el de por sí torpe gobierno de Bush, pero a pesar de eso, en ningún momento el Presidente amagó con renunciar o embarró la cancha.

No recuerdo en dicha campaña a Laura Bush o a Dick Cheney decir que la gobernabilidad del país estaría en riesgo, como si ha hablado el consorte de la que estrena vestiditos y juega a ser importante.

Bush sabía que iba a perder las legislativas y no amagó con renunciar, no prometió caos sin él ni nada por el estilo. Solamente dijo que los demócratas le harían la vida imposible con Irak, y se cumplió, pero en las sociedades evolucionadas la gobernabilidad está asegurada por más que el ejecutivo y el legislativo sean de distinto color.

Principalmente porque en las sociedades evolucionadas los que aspiran al cargo público piensan en el país, con sus diferencias, y suelen estar de acuerdo a grandes rasgos como cuando los demócratas aplaudieron de pie el discurso de Bush sobre si estáb con nosotros o con los terroristas.

A la larga, Bush es mejor que la perra, y va a ser mejor recordado. Bush fue reemplazado por uno peor que él, y la perra no tiene forma humana de encontrar un peor presidente que ella.

Read Full Post »

Hace poco Irak celebró elecciones relativamente limpias y sin violencia (en 2005 hubo 200 candidatos muertos, este año «sólo» 8, que siguen siendo 8 más que la cantidad correcta)… todo esto hubiera sido un sueño o un delirio en los tiempos de Saddam, pero nadie se ocupa de decirlo. 14 de las 18 provincias del país celebraron elecciones, y las otras 4 las celebrarán en otro momento, y aunque el recuento de votos es lento, al menos es más transparente que durante los 25 años anteriores a la llegada de Estados Unidos al país.

La violencia está disminuyendo mucho, es cierto que sigue habiendo atentados y grupúsculos que se resisten a la democracia, pero son una muy pequeña minoría, y los éxitos (como la captura de una mujer responsable de reclutar 80 mujeres suicidas) de las fuerzas armadas de la coalición son muchos más que los fracasos en el último tiempo.

Freed Countries

Obama va a poder cumplir su sueño de alegrar a la progrsía retirando las tropas de Irak pero no porque quiera, sino porque puede gracias al éxito que tuvieron Bush, Gates y el Gral. Petraeus. El mayor logro de Obama va a ser gracias a Bush, por más que a los demócratas les pese, porque nada más va a poder cumplir, ni el plan de salud universal ni salvar la economía, porque interviniendo en ella solamente logrará destruirla completamente.

Como si todo esto no fuera poco, las inversiones extranjeras en Irak aumentan interesantemente, sobretodo en el área de la construcción, donde muchas empresas consideran conveniente invertir en el país asiático, en el que no deben estar tan mal las cosas si recibe más inversiones que la Argentina donde todo está bien según los Kirchners y Morenos.

P.D.: Me gustaría ver a Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Paraguay y Argentina sumados a esa lista.

Read Full Post »

george-w-bush-presidente-de

Read Full Post »

Las últimas elecciones en Venezuela, donde se ponían en juego 328 municipios y 22 gobernaciones han dejado, además de todo lo que se ha dicho, un muy interesante panorama que es ciertamente equiparable en los tres países que menciono en el título.

La vida social, política, cultural y económica de los países no está en el campo, ni mucho menos en las zonas agrarias, se encuentra en las ciudades, en los grandes centros urbanos, como lo son Buenos Aires, Córdoba, Nueva York, Los Ángeles, Caracas y Maracaibo.

De esto puede desprenderse que los habitantes de las grandes ciudades son los más educados, y que por lo tanto deberían ser capaces de votar mejor… y parece que esto realmente ha pasado en estos tres países, con las derrotas de Cristina Fernández, John McCain y Hugo Chávez.

En la Argentina, los grandes centros urbanos le dieron la espalda al proyecto kirchnerista de monarquía votada y se agruparon detrás de la Coalición Cívica o del ridículo proyecto de Lavagna; el kirchnerismo prometía a corto plazo, y es lo que el interior, en su inmensa mayoría dependiente de las commodities, quería y por eso le dio el triunfo. La pérdida de apoyo en el interior merece un capítulo aparte, pero se debe a cuestiones propias de los Kirchner más que a cuestiones territoriales.

En Estados Unidos los grandes centros urbanos, donde late el corazón financiero y político del país se le dijo que no al Partido del Presidente Bush, ganó el voto intelectualoide de centro izquierda, teóricamente pensado a la espera de que se solucionen la infinidad de problemas que aquejan a los Estados Unidos, dicho de otra manera, en los centros urbanos importantes ganó la idea de cambio.

En Venezuela, donde Hugo Chávez sigue perdiendo apoyo, también perdió en los centros urbanos más importantes del país, donde se digita la economía y la vida política, lo que nuevamente trae a la luz esta tendencia de las ciudades educadas de alejarse, tarde, de los gobiernos belicosos que dilapidan recursos y por los que no se sienten representados.

Puede decirse que los centros urbanos tienden a votar a la centro-izquierda, alejándose de la izquierda radical o de la derecha religiosa del Corredor del Tornado estadounidense, pero me parece más acertado decir que en los centros urbanos, la gente medianamente educada, prefiere oponerse a los proyectos tiránicos o monárquicos a largo plazo, y que tiene una mayor capacidad de análisis a la hora de juzgar un gobierno, al menos para oponérsele.

Lo ideal sería que las ciudades entendieran la importancia del libre mercado y del capitalismo del que viven en vez de criticarlo y negarlo, el capitalismo que les permite trabajar y poder invertir en lo que tengan ganas, pero eso raya la utopía mientras los planes de estudio sigan siendo aprobados por Ministerios de Educación de gobiernos elegidos por gente ignorante y que se embelesa por palabras largas y difíciles, como si por un discurso aprendido de memoria se mostrara la capacidad de gobernar.

También es una muestra más de porqué en Venezuela, Argentina y el resto de América Latina se niega el progreso, ensalzando la ignorancia de las poblaciones rurales: se necesita gente que vote cualquier estupidez, gente que no entienda lo que se le dice, gente que no planifique, gente que crea en Mesías Bolivarianos de quienes la gente educada abjura. La única oportunidad de civilizar la barbarie, o de urbanizar las zonas rurales dejando solamente la necesaria para producción de materias primas, y no como asentamientos de ignorancia, está en la educación, y los gobiernos sudamericanos detestan los pueblos educados.

Cristina Fernández, George Bush y Hugo Chávez tienen en común mucho más de lo que ellos querrían aceptar, además de ser tres de los peores presidentes de la historia mundial moderna.

Read Full Post »

Más o menos he leído sobre la crisis económica actual que afecta a los Estados Unidos, y que en una clara sobredosis de boludol nuestra tilinga que firma decretos llamó Efecto Jazz, pero nunca encontré un artículo de porqué podría haberse producido este temblor que tanto aterra todo el mundo, hasta que, como varias veces me ha pasado, BlogBis trajo algunas respuestas que recomiendo leer.

Resulta que la crisis actual no es más que un resultado de algunas medidas tomadas por el buenazo de Bill Clinton, que con sus progremedidas complicó bastante a Freddie y Fannie, trayéndolos al estado caótico que ambos tienen actualmente.

La intervención estatal demócrata generó la crisis, y sería esperable que Obama acepte más estado para solucionarla (cosa que probablemente no pase), pero es inaceptable que el Partido Republicano plantee que es necesario que Washington y la FED jodan un poco más. McCain y Bush deben recordar que son del partido republicano, Bush no debe hacerles pagar una fangotada obscena de dólares a los contribuyentes, ni McCain debe festejar esta boludez.

No quiero imaginar la plata que va a costarle a los contribuyentes y al mundo si Barack Obama gana las elecciones, como nuestra gilinga con sobredosis cree que va a pasar.

Hay que volver al GOP de verdad, no a este híbrido desesperado por conseguir los votos de la progresía boludizada por Hollywood, que de paso son bastante poco socialistas con su propio patrimonio.

P.D.: Si es con plata ajena, cualquiera es socialista.

Read Full Post »

Esta es la transcripción del último discurso del Presidente George W. Bush sobre el Estado de la Unión, ante el Congreso el lunes 28 de enero de 2008; la transcripción pertenece al sitio de la CNN.

the-president-delivers-his-state-of-the-union-address-before-a-joint-session-of-congress-click-on-picture-for-larger-image.jpg

WASHINGTON (CNN)Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:

Seven years have passed since I first stood before you at this rostrum. In that time, our country has been tested in ways none of us could have imagined. We faced hard decisions about peace and war, rising competition in the world economy, and the health and welfare of our citizens.

These issues call for vigorous debate, and I think it’s fair to say we’ve answered the call.

(LAUGHTER)

Yet history will record that amid our differences we acted with purpose, and together we showed the world the power and resilience of American self-government.

All of us were sent to Washington to carry out the people’s business. That is the purpose of this body. It is the meaning of our oath. It remains our charge to keep.

The actions of the 110th Congress will affect the security and prosperity of our nation long after this session has ended. In this election year, let us show our fellow Americans that we recognize our responsibilities and are determined to meet them.

artbush2ap.jpg

Let us show them that Republicans and Democrats can compete for votes and cooperate for results at the same time.

(APPLAUSE)

From expanding opportunity to protecting our country, we’ve made good progress. Yet we have unfinished business before us, and the American people expect us to get it done.

In the work ahead, we must be guided by the philosophy that made our nation great. As Americans, we believe in the power of individuals to determine their destiny and shape the course of history. We believe that the most reliable guide for our country is the collective wisdom of ordinary citizens.

And so, in all we do, we must trust in the ability of free peoples to make wise decisions and empower them to improve their lives for their futures.

To build a prosperous future, we must trust people with their own money and empower them to grow our economy. As we meet tonight, our economy is undergoing a period of uncertainty. America’s added jobs for a record 52 straight months.

But jobs are now growing at a slower pace. Wages are up, but so are prices for food and gas. Exports are rising, but the housing market has declined.

At kitchen tables across our country, there is a concern about our economic future. In the long run, Americans can be confident about our economic growth, but in the short run, we can all see that that growth is slowing.

So, last week, my administration reached agreement with Speaker Pelosi and Republican Leader Boehner on a robust growth package that includes tax relief for individuals and families and incentives for business investment.

The temptation will be to load up the bill. That would delay it or derail it, and neither option is acceptable.

(APPLAUSE)

This is a good agreement that will keep our economy growing and our people working. And this Congress must pass it as soon as possible.

(APPLAUSE)

 

state-of-the-union.jpg

We have other work to do on taxes. Unless Congress acts, most of the tax relief we’ve delivered over the past seven years will be taken away.

Some in Washington argue that letting tax relief expire is not a tax increase.

Try explaining that to 116 million American taxpayers who will see their taxes rise by an average of $1,800. Others have said they would personally be happy to pay higher taxes. I welcome their enthusiasm. I am pleased to report that the IRS accepts both checks and money orders.

(LAUGHTER)

(APPLAUSE)

Most Americans think their taxes are high enough. With all the other pressures on their finances, American families should not have to worry about the federal government taking a bigger bite out of their paychecks. There is only one way to eliminate this uncertainty: Make the tax relief permanent.

Members of the Congress should know, if any bill — raises taxes reach — reaches my desk, I will veto it.

(APPLAUSE)

Just as we trust Americans with their own money, we need to earn their trust by spending their tax dollars wisely.

(APPLAUSE)

Next week, I’ll send you a budget that terminates or substantially reduces 151 wasteful or bloated programs, totaling more than $18 billion. The budget that I’ll submit will keep America on track for a surplus in 2012.

American families have to balance their budgets; so should their government.

The people’s trust in their government is undermined by congressional earmarks, special interest projects that are often snuck in at the last minute, without discussion or debate. committee reports that never even come to a vote.

Unfortunately, neither goal was met.

So, this time, if you send me an appropriations bill that does not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half, I’ll send it back to you with my veto.

(APPLAUSE)

And tomorrow I will issue an executive order that directs federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on by Congress.

If these items are truly worth funding, Congress should debate them in the open and hold a public vote.

(APPLAUSE)

Our shared responsibilities extend beyond matters of taxes and spending. On housing, we must trust Americans with the responsibility of home ownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in the housing market.

My administration brought together the Hope Now alliance, which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure.

And Congress can help even more.

Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, modernize the Federal Housing Administration, and allow state housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to help homeowners refinance their mortgages.

(APPLAUSE)

It’s been a difficult time for many American families and, by taking these steps, we can help more of them keep their homes.

To build a future of quality health care, we must trust patients and doctors to make medical decisions and empower them with better information and better options.

We share a common goal: making health care more affordable and accessible for all Americans.

(APPLAUSE)

The best way to achieve that goal is by expanding consumer choice, not government control.

(APPLAUSE)

BUSH: So I propose ending the bias in the tax code against those who do not get their health insurance through their employer. This one reform would put private coverage within reach for millions, and I call on the Congress to pass it this year.

(APPLAUSE)

Congress must also expand health savings accounts, create association health plans for small businesses, promote health information technology and confront the epidemic of junk medical lawsuits.

(APPLAUSE)

With all these steps, we will ensure that decisions about your medical care are made in the privacy of your doctor’s office, not in the halls of Congress.

(APPLAUSE)

On education, we must trust students to learn, if given the chance, and empower parents to demand results from our schools.

In neighborhoods across our country, there are boys and girls with dreams. And a decent education is their only hope of achieving them.

Six years ago, we came together to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, and today no one can deny its results.

Last year, 4th and 8th graders achieved the highest math scores on record. Reading scores are on the rise. African-American and Hispanic students posted all-time highs. Now we must…

(APPLAUSE)

Now we must work together to increase accountability, add flexibilities for states and districts, reduce the number of high school dropouts, provide extra help for struggling schools.

Members of Congress, the No Child Left Behind Act is a bipartisan achievement. It is succeeding. And we owe it to America’s children, their parents and their teachers to strengthen this good law.

(APPLAUSE)

We must also do more to help children when their schools do not measure up. Thanks to the D.C. Opportunity Scholarships you approved, more than 2,600 of the poorest children in our nation’s capital have found new hope at a faith-based or other nonpublic schools.

Sadly, these schools are disappearing at an alarming rate in many of America’s inner cities. So I will convene a White House summit aimed at strengthening these lifelines of learning.

And to open the doors of these schools to more children, I ask you to support a new $300 million program called Pell Grants for Kids. We have seen how Pell Grants help low-income college students realize their full potential.

Together, we’ve expanded the size and reach of these grants. Now let us apply the same spirit to help liberate poor children trapped in failing public schools.

(APPLAUSE)

On trade, we must trust American workers to compete with anyone in the world and empower them by opening up new markets overseas.

Today, our economic growth increasingly depends on our ability to sell American goods and crops and services all over the world.

So we’re working to break down barriers to trade and investment, wherever we can.

We’re working for a successful Doha round of trade talks. And we must complete a good agreement this year.

At the same time, we’re pursuing opportunities to open up new markets by passing free trade agreements.

I thank the Congress for approving a good agreement with Peru. And now I ask you to approve agreements with Colombia and Panama and South Korea.

(APPLAUSE)

Many products from these nations now enter America duty-free.

Yet many of our products face steep tariffs in their markets. These agreements will level the playing field. They will give us better access to nearly 100 million customers.

They will support good jobs for the finest workers in the world, those whose products say, «Made in the USA.»

(APPLAUSE)

These agreements also promote America’s strategic interests. The first agreement that will come before you is with Colombia, a friend of America that is confronting violence and terror and fighting drug traffickers. If we fail to pass this agreement, we will embolden the purveyors of false populism in our hemisphere.

So we must come together, pass this agreement, and show our neighbors in the region that democracy leads to a better life.

(APPLAUSE)

Trade brings better jobs and better choices and better prices. Yet, for some Americans, trade can mean losing a job. And the federal government has a responsibility to help.

(APPLAUSE)

I ask Congress to reauthorize and reform Trade Adjustment Assistance, so we can help these displaced workers learn new skills and find new jobs.

(APPLAUSE)

BUSH: And I ask Congress to reauthorize the Reform Trade Adjustment Assistance so we can help these displaced workers learn new skills and find new jobs.

(APPLAUSE)

To build a future of energy security, we must trust in the creative genius of American researchers and entrepreneurs and empower them to pioneer a new generation of clean energy technology.

(APPLAUSE)

Our security, our prosperity and our environment all require reducing our dependence on oil. consumption over the next decade, and you responded. Together, we should take the next steps. Let us fund new technologies that can generate coal power while capturing carbon emissions.

Let us increase the use of renewable power and emissions- free nuclear power.

(APPLAUSE)

Let us continue investing in advanced battery technology and renewable fuels to power the cars and trucks of the future.

(APPLAUSE)

Let us create a new international clean technology fund which will help developing nations like India and China make greater use of clean energy sources.

And let us complete an international agreement that has the potential to slow, stop, and eventually reverse the growth of greenhouse gases.

(APPLAUSE)

This agreement will be effective only if it includes commitments by every major economy and gives none a free ride.

The United States is committed to strengthening our energy security and confronting global climate change, and the best way to meet these goals is for America to continue leading the way toward the development of cleaner and more energy-efficient technology.

(APPLAUSE)

To keep America competitive into the future, we must trust in the skill of our scientists and engineers and empower them to pursue the breakthroughs of tomorrow.

Last year, Congress passed legislation supporting the American Competitiveness Initiative, but never followed through with the funding. This funding is essential to keeping our scientific edge.

So I ask Congress to double federal support for critical basic research in the physical sciences and ensure America remains the most dynamic nation on earth.

(APPLAUSE)

On matters of life and science, we must trust in the innovative spirit of medical researchers and empower them to discover new treatments while respecting moral boundaries.

In November, we witnessed a landmark achievement when scientists discovered a way to reprogram adult skin cells to act like embryonic stem cells.

This breakthrough has the potential to move us beyond the divisive debates of the past by extending the frontiers of medicine without the destruction of human life.

(APPLAUSE)

So we’re expanding funding for this type of ethical medical research. And, as we explore promising avenues of research, we must also ensure that all life treated with the dignity it deserves.

And so I call on Congress to pass legislation that bans unethical practices such as the buying, selling, patenting or cloning of human life.

(APPLAUSE)

On matters of justice, we must trust in the wisdom of our founders and empower judges who understand that the Constitution means what it says.

(APPLAUSE)

I’ve submitted judicial nominees who will rule by the letter of the law, not the whim of the gavel. Many of these nominees are being unfairly delayed. They are worthy of confirmation, and the Senate should give each of them a prompt up-or-down vote.

(APPLAUSE)

In communities across our land, we must trust in the good heart of the American people and empower them to serve their neighbors in need.

Over the past seven years, more of our fellow citizens have discovered that the pursuit of happiness leads to the path of service. Americans have volunteered in record numbers. Charitable donations are higher than ever. Faith-based groups are bringing hope to pockets of despair with newfound support from the federal government.

And, to help guarantee equal treatment of faith-based organizations when they compete for federal funds, I ask you to permanently extend Charitable Choice.

(APPLAUSE)

Tonight, the armies of compassion continue the march to a new day in the Gulf Coast. America honors the strength and resilience of the people of this region. We reaffirm our pledge to help them build stronger and better than before.

And tonight I’m pleased to announce that, in April, we will host this year’s North American Summit of Canada, Mexico, and the United States in the great city of New Orleans.

(APPLAUSE)

There are two other pressing challenges that I’ve raised repeatedly before this body, and that this body has failed to address: entitlement spending and immigration.

Every member in this chamber knows that spending on entitlement programs — like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — is growing faster than we can afford.

We all know the painful choices ahead if American stays on this path: massive tax increases, sudden and drastic cuts in benefits, and crippling deficits.

I’ve laid out proposals to reform these programs. Now I ask members of Congress to offer your proposals and come up with a bipartisan solution to save these vital programs for our children and our grandchildren.

(APPLAUSE)

The other pressing challenge is immigration. America needs to secure our borders. And, with your help, my administration is taking steps to do so. We’re increasing work site enforcement, deploying fences and advanced technologies to stop illegal crossings.

We’ve effectively ended the policy of «catch and release» at the border. And by the end of this year, we will have doubled the number of border patrol agents.

Yet we also need to acknowledge that we will never fully secure our border until we create a lawful way for foreign workers to come here and support our economy.

(APPLAUSE)

This will take pressure off the border and allow law enforcement to concentrate on those who mean us harm.

We must also find a sensible and humane way to deal with people here illegally. Illegal immigration is complicated, but it can be resolved, and it must be resolved in a way that upholds both our laws and our highest ideals.

(APPLAUSE)

This is the business of our nation here at home. Yet building a prosperous future for our citizens also depends on confronting enemies abroad and advancing liberty in troubled regions of the world.

Our foreign policy is based on a clear premise: We trust that people, when given the chance, will choose a future of freedom and peace.

In the last seven years, we have witnessed stirring moments in the history of liberty. We’ve seen citizens in Georgia and Ukraine stand up for their right to free and fair elections. We’ve seen people in Lebanon take to the streets to demand their independence. We’ve seen Afghans emerge from the tyranny of the Taliban and choose a new president and a new parliament.

We’ve seen jubilant Iraqis holding up ink-stained fingers and celebrating their freedom.

These images of liberty have inspired us.

(APPLAUSE)

In the past seven years, we’ve also seen the images that have sobered us. We’ve watched throngs of mourners in Lebanon and Pakistan carrying the caskets of beloved leaders taken by the assassins’ hands.

We’ve seen wedding guests in blood-soaked finery staggering from a hotel in Jordan, Afghans and Iraqis blown up in mosques and markets, and trains in London and Madrid ripped apart by bombs.

On a clear September day, we saw thousands of our fellow citizens taken from us in an instant.

These horrific images serve as a grim reminder. The advance of liberty is opposed by terrorists and extremists — evil men who despise freedom, despise America and aim to subject millions to their violent rule.

Since 9/11, we have taken the fight to these terrorists and extremists. We will stay on the offense. We will keep up the pressure, and we will deliver justice to our enemies.

We are engaged in the defining ideological struggle of the 21st century. The terrorists oppose every principle of humanity and decency that we hold dear.

Yet, in this war on terror, there is one thing we and our enemies agree on. In the long run, men and women who are free to determine their own destinies will reject terror and refuse to live in tyranny.

And that is why the terrorists are fighting to deny this choice to the people in Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Palestinian territories.

And that is why, for the security of America and the peace of the world, we are spreading the hope of freedom.

Let us show them that Republicans and Democrats can compete for votes and cooperate for results at the same time.

(APPLAUSE)

From expanding opportunity to protecting our country, we’ve made good progress. Yet we have unfinished business before us, and the American people expect us to get it done.

In the work ahead, we must be guided by the philosophy that made our nation great. As Americans, we believe in the power of individuals to determine their destiny and shape the course of history. We believe that the most reliable guide for our country is the collective wisdom of ordinary citizens.

And so, in all we do, we must trust in the ability of free peoples to make wise decisions and empower them to improve their lives for their futures.

(APPLAUSE)

In Afghanistan, America, our 25 NATO allies and 15 partner nations are helping the Afghan people defend their freedom and rebuild their country.

Thanks to the courage of these military and civilian personnel, a nation that was once a safe haven for al Qaeda is now a young democracy where boys and girls are going to school. New roads and hospitals are being built. And people are looking to the future with new hope.

These successes must continue. So we’re adding 3,200 Marines to our forces in Afghanistan, where they will fight the terrorists and train the Afghan army and police.

Defeating the Taliban and al Qaeda is critical to our security, and I thank the Congress for supporting America’s vital mission in Afghanistan.

(APPLAUSE)

In Iraq, the terrorists and extremists are fighting to deny a proud people their liberty and fighting to establish safe havens for attacks across the world.

One year ago, our enemies were succeeding in their efforts to plunge Iraq into chaos, so we reviewed our strategy and changed course.

We launched a surge of American forces into Iraq. We gave our troops a new mission: Work with the Iraqi forces to protect the Iraqi people, pursue the enemy in his strongholds, and deny the terrorists sanctuary anywhere in the country.

The Iraqi people quickly realized that something dramatic had happened.

Those who had worried that America was preparing to abandon them instead saw tens of thousands of American forces flowing into their country. They saw our forces moving into neighborhoods, clearing out the terrorists and staying behind to ensure the enemy did not return. And they saw our troops, along with provincial reconstruction teams that include Foreign Service officers and other skilled public servants, coming in to ensure that improved security was followed by improvements in daily life.

Our military and civilians in Iraq are performing with courage and distinction, and they have the gratitude of our whole nation.

(APPLAUSE)

The Iraqis launched a surge of their own.

In the fall of 2006, Sunni tribal leaders grew tired of al Qaeda’s brutality and started a popular uprising called the Anbar Awakening. Over the past year, similar movements have spread across the country.

Today, the grassroots surge includes more than 80,000 Iraqi citizens who are fighting the terrorists.

The government in Baghdad has stepped forward as well, adding more than 100,000 new Iraqi soldiers and police during the past year.

While the enemy is still dangerous and more work remains, the American and Iraqi surges have achieved results few of us could have imagined just one year ago.

(APPLAUSE)

When we met last year, many said that containing the violence was impossible. A year later, high-profile terrorist attacks are down; civilian deaths are down; sectarian killings are down.

When we met last year, militia extremists, some armed and trained by Iran, were wreaking havoc in large areas of Iraq.

(APPLAUSE)

When we met last year our troop levels in Iraq were on the rise. Today, because of the progress just described, we are implementing a policy of return on success, and the surge forces we sent to Iraq are beginning to come home.

This progress is a credit to the valor of our troops and the brilliance of their commanders.

This evening, I want to speak directly to our men and women on the front lines, soldiers and sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast you and more.

Our nation is grateful for your courage. We are proud of your accomplishments.

And tonight, in this hallowed chamber with the American people as our witness, we make you a solemn pledge: In the fight ahead, you will have all you need to protect our nation.

(APPLAUSE)

And I ask Congress to meet its responsibilities to these brave men and women by fully funding our troops.

(APPLAUSE)

Our enemies in Iraq have been hit hard. They are not yet defeated and we can still expect tough fighting ahead.

Our objective in the coming year is to sustain and build on the gains we made in 2007, while transitioning to the next phase of our strategy. American troops are shifting from leading operations to partnering with Iraqi forces and eventually to a protective over-watch mission.

As part of this transition, one Army Brigade Combat team and one Marine Expeditionary Unit have already come home and will not be replaced. In the coming months, four additional brigades and two Marine battalions will follow suit.

Taken together, this means more than 20,000 of our troops are coming home.

(APPLAUSE)

Any further drawdown of U.S. troops will be based on conditions in Iraq and the recommendations of our commanders.

General Petraeus has warned that too fast a drawdown could result in, quote, «the disintegration of the Iraqi security forces, al Qaeda- Iraq regaining lost ground, and a marked increase in violence.»

Members of Congress, having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow this to happen.

(APPLAUSE)

In the coming year, we will work with Iraqi leaders as they build on the progress they’re making toward political reconciliation.

At the local levels, Sunnis, Shiite and Kurds are beginning to come together to reclaim their communities and rebuild their lives. Progress in the provinces must be matched by progress in Baghdad.

(APPLAUSE)

We’re seeing some encouraging signs. The national government is sharing oil revenues with the provinces. The parliament recently passed both a pension law and de-Baathification reform. They’re now debating a provincial powers law.

The Iraqis still have a distance to travel. But, after decades of dictatorship and the pain of sectarian violence, reconciliation is taking place and the Iraqi people are taking control of their future.

(APPLAUSE)

The mission in Iraq has been difficult and trying for our nation, but it is in the vital interest of the United States that we succeed.

A free Iraq will deny al Qaeda a safe haven. A free Iraq will show millions across the Middle East that a future of liberty is possible. A free Iraq will be a friend of America, a partner in fighting terror and a source of stability in a dangerous part of the world.

By contrast, a failed Iraq would embolden the extremists, strengthen Iran and give terrorists a base from which to launch new attacks on our friends, our allies and our homeland.

The enemy has made its intentions clear.

At a time when the momentum seemed to favor them, al Qaeda’s top commander in Iraq declared that they will not rest until they have attacked us here in Washington.

My fellow Americans, we will not rest either. We will not rest until this enemy has been defeated.

(APPLAUSE)

We must do the difficult work today so that, years from now, people will look back and say that this generation rose to the moment, prevailed in a tough fight and left behind a more hopeful region and a safer America.

(APPLAUSE)

We’re also standing against the forces of extremism in the Holy Land, where we have new cause for hope. Palestinians have elected a president who recognizes that confronting terror is essential to achieving a state where his people can live in dignity and at peace with Israel.

Israelis have leaders who recognize that a peaceful, democratic Palestinian state will be a source of lasting security.

This month in Ramallah and Jerusalem, I assured leaders from both sides that America will do and I will do everything we can to help them achieve a peace agreement that defines a Palestinian state by the end of this year.

The time has come for a Holy Land where a democratic Israel and a democratic Palestine live side by side in peace.

(APPLAUSE)

We’re also standing against the forces of extremism embodied by the regime in Tehran.

Iran’s rulers oppress a good and talented people. And wherever freedom advances in the Middle East, it seems the Iranian regime is there to oppose it.

Iran is funding and training militia groups in Iraq, supporting Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon, and backing Hamas’ efforts to undermine peace in the Holy Land.

Tehran is also developing ballistic missiles of increasing range and continues to develop its capability to enrich uranium, which could be used to create a nuclear weapon.

Our message to the people of Iran is clear. We have no quarrel with you. We have respect your traditions and your history. We look forward to the day when you have your freedom.

Our message to the leaders of Iran is also clear. Verifiably suspend your nuclear enrichment so negotiations can begin. And to rejoin the community of nations, come clean about your nuclear intentions and past actions. Stop your oppression at home. Cease your support for terror abroad.

But above all, know this: America will confront those who threaten our troops; we will stand by our allies; and we will defend our vital interests in the Persian Gulf.

(APPLAUSE)

On the homefront, we will continue to take every lawful and effective measure to protect our country. This is our most solemn duty.

We are grateful that there has not been another attack on our soil since 9/11. But this is not for the lack of desire or effort on the part of the enemy.

In the past six years, we’ve stopped numerous attacks, including a plot to fly a plane into the tallest building in Los Angeles, and another to blow up passenger jets bound for America over the Atlantic.

Dedicated men and women in our government toil day and night to stop the terrorists from carrying out their plans. These good citizens are saving American lives, and everyone in this chamber owes them our thanks.

(APPLAUSE)

And we owe them something more. We owe them the tools they need to keep our people safe. And one of the most important tools we can give them is the ability to monitor terrorist communications.

To protect America, we need to know who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying and what they’re planning.

Last year, Congress passed legislation to help us do that.

Unfortunately, Congress set the legislation to expire on February 1st. That means, if you don’t act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger.

Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted. Congress must pass liability protection for companies believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend America. We’ve had ample time for debate. The time to act is now.

(APPLAUSE)

Protecting our nation from the dangers of a new century requires more than good intelligence and a strong military. It also requires changing the conditions that breed resentment and allow extremists to prey on despair. So America is using its influence to build a freer, more hopeful and more compassionate world.

This is a reflection of our national interests. It is the calling of our conscience. America opposes genocide in Sudan.

(APPLAUSE)

We support freedom in countries from Cuba and Zimbabwe to Belarus and Burma.

(APPLAUSE)

America’s leading the fight against global poverty with strong education initiatives and humanitarian assistance. We’ve also changed the way we deliver aid by launching the Millennium Challenge Account.

This program strengthens democracy, transparency and the rule of law in developing nations, and I ask you to fully fund this important initiative.

(APPLAUSE)

America is leading the fight against global hunger. Today, more than half the world’s food aid comes from the United States.

(APPLAUSE)

And tonight, I ask Congress to support an innovative proposal to provide food assistance by purchasing crops directly from farmers in the developing world, so we can build up local agriculture and help break the cycle of famine.

(APPLAUSE)

America is leading the fight against disease. With your help, we’re working to cut, by half, the number of malaria-related deaths in 15 African nations. And our emergency plan for AIDS relief is treating 1.4 million people.

We can bring healing and hope to many more. So I ask you to maintain the principles that have changed behavior and made this program a success. And I call on you to double our initial commitment to fighting HIV/AIDS by approving an additional $30 billion over the next five years.

(APPLAUSE)

America is a force for hope in the world because we are a compassionate people. And some of the most compassionate Americans are those who have stepped forward to protect us. we might live in freedom and peace.

Over the past seven years, we’ve increased funding for veterans by more than 95 percent. And as we increase funding…

(APPLAUSE)

And as we increase funding, we must also reform our veterans’ system to meet the needs of a new war and a new generation.

And, as we increase funding, we must also reform our veterans system to meet the needs of a new war and a new generation.

(APPLAUSE)

I call on Congress to enact the reforms recommended by Senator Bob Dole and Secretary Donna Shalala so we can improve the system of care for our wounded warriors and help them build lives of hope and promise and dignity.

(APPLAUSE)

Our military families also sacrifice for America. They endure sleepless nights and the daily struggle of providing for children while a loved one is serving far from home.

We have a responsibility to provide for them. So I ask you to join me in expanding their access to child care, creating new hiring preferences for military spouses across the federal government, and allowing our troops to transfer their unused education benefits to their spouses or children.

Our military families serve our nation. They inspire our nation, and tonight our nation honors them.

(APPLAUSE)

The secret of our strength, the miracle of America, is that our greatness lies not in our government, but in the spirit and determination of our people. When the federal convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, our nation was bound by the Articles of Confederation which began with the words, «We the undersigned delegates.» Constitution, he offered an important revision, and opened with words that changed the course of our nation and the history of the world: «We the people.»

By trusting the people, our founders wagered that a great and noble nation could be built on the liberty that resides in the hearts of all men and women. By trusting the people, succeeding generations transformed our fragile young democracy into the most powerful nation on earth and a beacon of hope for millions.

And so long as we continue to trust the people, our nation will prosper, our liberty will be secure and the state of our union will remain strong.

(APPLAUSE)

BUSH: So tonight, with confidence in freedom’s power and trust in the people, let us set forth to do their business. God bless America.

Read Full Post »

Después del exabrupto durante la cumbre de Santiago en que el loquillo Chávez fue humillado por el Rey Juan Carlos, y después siguió humillándose solo con declaraciones que aumentaban en imbecilidad a medida que el mundo se reía de él, y de cómo el Rey había intentado ponerlo en su lugar, ahora el loquillo decidió que quiere aliarse con Irán en otro sentido extraño, quiere desarrollar energía nuclear (sí, esa que el mundo civilizado no quiere que Irán tenga porque Irán no es civilizado y tenemos miedo que la use para seguir con esa estúpida revolución socialista-islamista anti mundo libre)

Por suerte, todavía quedan algunos seres humanos con algo de relleno dentro de los huesos del cráneo, que le pidieron al Presidente de los Estados Unidos que deje la retórica y haga algo para frenar al desquiciado, pero obviamente nadie habla de acciones militares, sino de algo más util, sutil y concreto, como lo que proponemos desde acá, que es nada más ni nada menos DEJAR DE FINANCIAR el Socialismo Terrorista del Siglo 21 dejando de comprarle petróleo al caudillo boludovariano.

«Estados Unidos no puede continuar permitiendo que esta amenaza se desarrolle en nuestro hemisferio», dijeron en una declaración escrita los congresistas Connie Mack, republicano, y Ron Klein, demócrata, ambos de la Florida.

Los dos congresistas son conocidos por su activismo contra el populismo antiestadounidense de Chávez. Klein, quien es además vicepresidente de un grupo de trabajo legislativo sobre Irán, promovió una resolución aprobada este mes en la cual la Cámara de Representantes expresa su preocupación por la presencia iraní en Latinoamérica.

«Irán ha tenido un gran interés en ayudar a Venezuela con el desarrollo de tecnología nuclear», dijeron en su comunicado conjunto. «En febrero del 2006, el presidente de la cámara legislativa iraní anunció una oferta de ayuda a Venezuela en ese campo».

Mack dijo que Chávez no oculta sus planes de «seguir los pasos de su amigo Mahmud Ahmadinejad», el presidente iraní, y de iniciar un programa nuclear en Venezuela, y al parecer está ahora «decidido a cumplir ese deseo».


«La peligrosa alianza entre Chávez y Ahmadinejad y su deseo de desarrollar tecnología nuclear, debe ser causa de gran alarma para los Estados Unidos y sus aliados en la región», dijo Mack.

Klein sostuvo que la proliferación nuclear «es una de las mayores amenazas para nuestra seguridad nacional».

En este punto nos gustaría disentir con Klein, ya que la proliferación nuclear de Chávez no es una amenaza para la seguridad nacional de los Estados Unidos, sino a la de todo este Continente, y Estados Unidos haría bien en, la menos, decir que se preocupa por el resto si pretende que el resto de América lo apoye en la cruzada pro mundo libre.

Mack dijo que en septiembre el Departamento de Estado le envió una carta en respuesta a sus preocupaciones indicándole que «esta administración comparte sus preocupaciones sobre la creciente relación de Venezuela con Irán y su manifiesto deseo de entrar en una cooperación nuclear con Teherán».

Lo que sí me pregunto, ¿a Estados Unidos no le interesa que el hijo putativo de alguien que defiende los atentados contra las Torres Gemelas del 9/11 y su esposa, ambos amigos de Chávez, no tengan algunas centrales nucleares también?; no es que me moleste que la Argentina tenga energía nuclear, porque a diferencia de Greenpeace, no nos tragamos el verso y reconocemos que es verdaderamente limpia, y accidentes se dan en todos los ámbitos, pero sí me preocupa que la Argentina nuclear de Atocha II siga con las amistades peligrosas.

Read Full Post »

Hoy se inició una campaña en la que todos los que suscriben van ahablar sobre un mismo temam, el mismo día. El tema de este año es el Medio Ambiente, y la idea es que todos hablen de lo mismo desde distintas ópticas, medianamente relacionando el tema con el contenido de cada blog.

Hoy en día el Medio Ambiente, la Defensa del Medio Ambiente y todo eso, más que una cruzada, una opción, o algo defendible es una ideología, una nueva forma de fanatizarse; es algo que la clase media y media-alta encontró para dejar de aburrirse después de los fiascos que fueron el comunismo en los ’50, el hippismo en los ’60, el Psicoanálisis en los ’70 y cuanta estupidez se puso de moda en el mundo.

Qué está pasando con el mundo, con las corrientes, glaciares, bosques y las especies que se extinguen a lo largo y ancho del planeta nadie lo sabe en realidad, pero por las dudas se forman paneles de expertos para defender posturas de ambos lados cada tanto, con el fin de dar a estas clases medias, progresitas como nadie, resultados distintos y muchas veces contradictorios, a los que no deberían arribar científicos analizando hechos, ya que ante los mismos hechos, la misma ciencia debería dar los mismos resultados.

En la Argentina la situación es más complicada y especialmente retorcida, porque un país que castiga a varios millones de personas que viven cerca del Riachuelo se envolvió como Bolocco en una bandera verde para de alguna forma intentar frenar un emprendimiento privado en Fray Bentos (eso es en Uruguay, o sea, en la jurisdicción de otro país), simplemente porque a un par de piqueteros chillones se les ocurrió, sin pruebas, sin ciencia, solamente por estupidez, que la planta iba a contaminar el Río Uruguay. Sobre este tema se ha hablado mucho, incluso se llegó a decir que el boicot fogoneado por el gobernador de Entre Ríos se debió simplemente a que en Uruguay no pedían la coima descomunal que se pedía en tierras de Busti, cosa que al caprichoso no le gustó.

Otro problema, un poco más grande y serio, es el de Greenpeace, PETA, ALF, y demás organizaciones eco-terroristas y eco-apocalípticas que se encargan de vender historias del fin del mundo a la población incauta consumidora de Página 12 sobre todo lo que no les gusta, siempre citando a diversos expertos que no logran convencer a la mayor parte de la comunidad científica internacional.

Quizás los más famosos sean los Tree-hugers de Greenpeace que se la pasan chillando sobre los árboles, que no se van a acabar, ya que hoy en día es cuánta mayor cantidad de árboles existe sobre la tierra, aunque ha cambiado su localización; y PETA, que violenta todo lo que pueda en una pseudo defensa sobre los animalitos a los que la gente trata mal según ellos, y que deberían vivir libres en nuetras ciudades (¿soy yo o alguien más notó la imbecilidad sin precedentes en eso?), obviamente PETA está detrás de muchas quemas a laboratorios, instalaciones médicas y demás, saboteando investigaciones que en una de esas a usted podrían salvarle la vida, si es que no se la están salvando hoy, porque PETA quiere prohibir las investigaciones sobre insulina en cerdos, entre tantas otras cosas.

Estas estupideces y muchas más abundan en los medios, pero todavía no empezamos a hablar de la imbecilidad mayor, que es la denigraciónque bajo toda forma quieren vender acerca de los alimentos transgénicos, alimentos que no producen cáncer ni chicos con cuatro brazos, tres piernas y cerebro, y que podrían ayudar a gran parte de la población mundial a salir del hambre; pero estos grupos verdes se han encargado de demonizar y burocratizar de tal forma la pruducción de esta posible solución, que la gente sigue pasando hambre, y a pesar de la tonelada de estudios que se hacen sobre los alimentos todos los años, que demuestran su eficacia y ‘limpieza’, siguen siendo demonizados. Esta es la prueba mayor de toda la imbecilidad de la clase media, porque esta puede darse el lujo de no comer carne y comer tofu o alguna huevada verde, pero las clases más bajas son las que terminan pagando el fardo; por lo que frenarsin fundamentos estas investigaciones se avanza hacia un genocidio que va a hacer parecer lo del Nazismo como un juego.

Como si todo esto no fuera suficiente para al menos dudar del incipiente caos que nos quieren vender algunos, otro problema importante es el de los medios pro-apocalípticos que se la pasan mostrando imágenes de talas de árboles, ríos negros, o demás basura en el resto del mundo, pero que nunca cubren los daños que la soja le hace al suelo, el daño casi irreparable de las Papeleras Argentinas… pero pedir objetividad y cerebro en los medios es un sueño, por lo que simplemente hay que ver, tomar con pinzas el fanatismo, y seguir; de vez en cuando algún informe es bueno, el resto es basura verde, y lo triste es que no es reciclable y puede producir efectos similares a los de una lobotomía.

Lo de Chávez saboteando el Etanol para financiar su petrodictadura, Al Gore recibiendo un Premio Nobel por nada, el Protocolo de Kyoto y todas las cumbres que se hacen a menudo algún día serán analizados, pero por ahora, lo único que realmente podemos decir es que es cierto que la tierra merece defensa, pero una defensa real, no fanatizada; para el próximo año la campaña debería ser «ambiente sin ambientalistas».

El tema del ambiente y del ambientalismo es largo y hay que discutirlo mucho, y a menos que haya un consenso y los fanáticos de ambos lados lo vean de una buena vez, nunca se va a saber la verdad sobre si nos estamos por morir ahogados o no.

Read Full Post »

Vean cómo estas ratas huyen ante la verdad.

Read Full Post »

El tema del día es la 62da Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, y aunque ya hemos tratado la ausencia de Chávez, una particular atención merece el discurso del Presidente de los Estados Unidos de América.

Todos los que siguen las idas y vueltas de la novela internacional esperaban que en su discurso, el Presidente Bush hablara del Plan Nuclear Iraní, del Eje del Mal, de la relación con Corea del Norte y de la Guerra de Irak, pero como pocas veces, el Presidente nos sorprendió con un discurso centrado en otros puntos, en una de esas no tan mediáticos, pero sí tan o más importantes que Corea del Norte y el acomplejado que la Gobierna.

En su discurso, el Presidente habló de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, que a pesar de tener 60 años, en muchos lugares el respeto por estos derechos sigue siendo algo parecido a un sueño; sobre este punto, hizo especial referencia a la Cuba retrógrada que aún gobierna el decrépito Castro, y dijo que «el largo mandato de un cruel dictador está llegando a su fin», para luego decir algo que todos sabemos, que es que «El pueblo cubano está preparado para su libertad. Y cuando la nación entre en un periodo de transición, la ONU debe insistir en la necesidad de que se reinstaure la libertad de expresión, de asociación, y por último, de celebrar unas elecciones libres»

Como no podía ser de otra manera, los cubanitos que estaban de paseo por Nueva York se indignaron sobremanera por estas palabras tan acertadas de Bush, y en un acto de perfecta inmadurez se pararon haciendo pucheros y dejaron la sala, para después llorarle a cuanto micrófono tuvieron a su alcance, aprovechando la libertad de expresión y de prensa de los Estados Unidos, libertades que ellos no conocen.

Para justificar su capricho de nene chiquito, la delegación cubana emitió un comunicado diciendo que se retiraban «en una expresión de rechazo profundo a la declaración mediocre y arrogante emitida por el presidente Bush» del que también dijo que es «responsable de la muerte de más de 600.000 civiles en Irak; autorizó la tortura de prisioneros en la Base Naval de Guantánamo y el secuestro de personas, así como vuelos clandestinos y cárceles secretas. Es un criminal y no tiene autoridad moral ni credibilidad para emitir juicio sobre ningún otro país» en un desesperado intento por desviar la atención de tan interesante y acertado discurso.

Por nuestra parte, aplaudimos que por fin el Gobierno de Washington mire lo que pasa por acá cercay no preste total atención al Oriente Medio, cuando el dictador más viejo y choto del planeta está a pocos kilómetros de sus costas.

También es importante recalcar que el no hacer mención al Plan Nuclear Iraní, a todos los problemas que Ahmedicomosea causó con su presencia, y alCaudillo auto-nombrado heredero del Dictador, la Administración Bush se sacó un problema de encima, porque no van a tener mucho de que hablar estos sujetos ahora.

Read Full Post »

Ha causado una verdadera revolución una frase del Presidente de los Estados Unidos, que este pronunció siendo consultado por sus manejos de la Guerra de Irak. El problema con esta frase tan poco común es que muchas personas la han sacado de contexto, con el fin de ridiculizar al primer mandatario de los Estados Unidos. Acá intentamos analizar eso, no la frase, que nos parece más clara que el agua.

En el Artículo Bush ‘mata’ a Nelson Mandela el diario El Mundo, de España, cita al Presidente cuando dice:«Escuché a alguien decir ¿Dónde esta Mandela? Bueno, Mandela está muerto porque Sadam Husein mató a todos los Mandelas»

Y por las dudas, dejo el original: «I thought an interesting comment was made when somebody said to me, I heard somebody say, where’s Mandela? Well, Mandela is dead, because Saddam Hussein killed all the Mandelas.»

Todo el mundo progre sabe o cree que George W. Bush creía, o le habían dicho, que Nelson Mandela había muerto, lo que ninguno de estos chicos anti-mundo libre quiere entender es que el mensaje que dio es claro, y simplemente quiere decir:

«Saddam Hussein era un dictador violento, y como tal, impedía que surgiera en el seno del pueblo iraquí un lider opositor que levantara a todo el pueblo contra el déspota, como hizo Mandela en Sudáfrica, simplemente porque Saddam mató a todos los potenciales Mandelas»

¿Tan dificil es entender eso, o el afán por seguir diciéndole a Bush asesino hace que se inventen estupideces como esta noticia, en un diario teóricamente interesante y legible?, ¿habrán festejado todos los muchachos Progre, imaginando muchos GI’s entrando en Sudáfrica buscando al ex-Presidente?, ¿no hay suficientes noticias reales en este mundo, que hay que recurrir a estupideces traídas de los pelos, y encima falsas?

Read Full Post »